CAPR's blog

How to Appeal Your Property Valuation

CAPR has noticed certain practices in King County Governance that ignore the devaluation of a property caused by a nuisance.  Neighboring properties may have operations which cause enough of a nuisance to devalue the use and enjoyment of your property.  If you are living in such a situation, CAPR recommends and appeal to King County independent board of appeals for your property tax assessment.  The form is linked here: http://www.kingcounty.gov/~/media/independent/board-of-appeals/documents/2017/RealPropertyPetition.ashx?la=en 

5-1-17 CAPR Newsletter Legislative Update

Dear CAPR members, friends,supporters!

Washington Water War The 8th Day of the Special Session will begin on Monday May 1. This will leave 22 days of the special session to fight for water rights for every citizen in the state. Senator Jim Honeyford (Jim.Honeyford@leg.wa.gov) rightly stated no budget will pass until after a Hirst fix bill has passed! The prior session ended with no bill passing but the legislature is still looking at SSB 5239 to provide a solution for the thousands of families who have had their water rights taken. Senator Honeyford's open and strong support of families damaged by the Hirst Decision is appreciated! The damaging amendments from Democrats Stanford and Springer must not again prevent the passage of a bill to fix the Hirst Decision.

Pocket Gophers Continue to Endanger the Human Species.

Pocket Gopher have had special status over humans beginning in 2014, when environmental groups pushed the federal government to list them as endangered species.  They have been thriving as they always have, but rural life is endangered by the presence of gophers.  Thurston County commissioners are trying to inject a little sanity to the unfounded listing of this species of gophers.

Stealing Our Water One Lawsuit at a Time - The Hirst Heist and Our Diminishing Legislature

By Glen Morgan and Cindy Alia

On October 6, 2016,  Futurewise, with the assistance of six Washington State Supreme Court Justices, managed to win the lawsuit lottery.  The Supreme Court ruled in Hirst v. W. Washington Growth Management Hearings Board (decision linked here) on a 6-3 vote in favor of Futurewise and against the people.  This ruling invented new land use rules approved by no legislature or elected official.  This litigious and aggressive environmental NGO funded by wealthy Seattle donors was able to end the historic private well exemption.  

CAPR Thanks Members For a Great Banquet!

CAPR thanks it members for a great banquet 2017! We enjoyed getting together with many of our fine members to catch up on news, friendships, and the joy of seeing one another again. We all enjoyed networking with one another, learning about strategies, ideas, and discussing great ways to continue working together. Our workshop presenters provided excellent insight into current events and battles, sharing experience and expertise we all value!

Will SB 5239 Be Enough of a Fix to the Hirst Decision?

5239 is most likely going to be heard in the house before the March 29 deadline to hear bills in the opposite house.  Those who understand the devastating loss of property and water rights, loss of the use of their land, and extreme devaluation, often up to 90% of their value, for thousands of families of many counties are working to improve this bill.  Those who do not understand this kind of loss are likewise involved.  The Hirst decision has also impacted counties and the state in terms of loss of productivity and commerce in their communities along with a drop in tax revenue.

Nuisance or Normal...Is Marijuana ready for Agricultural Status?

 House bill 1692 would allow for marijuana grow operations the status of agricultural activities, this would include the growing and production including products of grow operations the legal protections of any other farm production.  The argument for this status is framed as a property right.  The problem with that argument is that agricultural status recognizes special needs of the property rights of agricultural activities in terms of methods and means of agriculture and not simply on the basis an agricultural product is something that is grown.  Agricultural business is protected from the use of nuisance law if the operation is consistent with good practices and was established prior to surrounding non-agricultural uses unless the activity constitutes a substantial adverse effect on public health and safety.  Tradit

Pages

Subscribe to RSS - CAPR's blog