SSB 6162: Property Tax “Reform” or Reform Theater?

By Dominique Scarimbolo, CAPR King Chapter President, 2/16/26

Bottom Line:
SSB 6162 is not a bad bill — but it is not meaningful property tax reform. It expands an existing relief program for a narrow group and rebrands part of the tax system, without fixing the underlying problems driving Washington’s property tax crisis.


What This Bill Actually Does

1) Expands existing senior/disabled/veteran exemptions (modest relief for a narrow group)
This bill raises income thresholds and increases the amount of home value that can be exempted for qualifying seniors, disabled individuals, and some veterans.
This helps some people stay in their homes — which is good.
However, this program already existed. This bill expands it slightly; it does not create new protections for most homeowners.

2) Rebrands the state property tax as the “state school levy”
The bill requires tax statements to label the state portion of property tax as the “state school levy.”
This does not reduce taxes.
This does not expand exemptions.
This does not reform how property taxes work.
It is a messaging change — not a structural change.

3) Consolidates how the state property tax is structured
The bill merges technical components of the state levy into a single levy.
This does not lower the tax rate.
This does not cap future growth.
This does not limit levy stacking.
This is administrative cleanup, not reform.

4) Makes small technical updates to farm equipment exemptions
This updates language because of the levy consolidation.
It does not meaningfully expand exemptions.


What This Bill Does NOT Do

SSB 6162 does not:

  • Reduce property tax rates

  • Cap assessed values

  • Address levy stacking

  • Fix mass appraisal practices

  • Enforce uniformity

  • Protect working families

  • Limit local government levy abuse

  • Reform the McCleary-driven tax shift

  • Provide relief for small businesses

  • Address people being taxed out of their homes

  • Create systemic accountability for assessors

  • Change how fast taxes can rise

In other words:
The underlying property tax system remains untouched.


Why This Matters

With dozens of sponsors, this bill allows legislators to claim they “did something” about property taxes — without taking on the politically difficult work of real reform.

This is a familiar pattern:

  • Appear responsive

  • Expand a small relief program

  • Rebrand taxes in friendlier language

  • Leave the system itself unchanged

That’s not reform. That’s reform theater.


CAPR’s Position Logically

This bill is not harmful, and helping seniors stay in their homes is worthwhile.
But it should not be sold to the public as property tax reform.

Real reform would include:

  • Structural limits on levy stacking

  • Enforceable uniformity

  • Caps on assessment growth

  • Transparency in how valuations are calculated

  • Protections for working families and small property owners

  • Accountability for systemic overassessment

Until those issues are addressed, expanding exemptions for a narrow group is not reform — it is an admission that the system itself is broken.


In short:
SSB 6162 is better described as property tax reform theater — not meaningful reform.


February 16, 2026